CAMERA

Too many outlets have misled readers on Macklemore's history by pretending the controversy is merely about pro-Palestinian comments.

The @guardian suggested the 1929 Hebron Massacre was the fault of "Jewish extremists." It's a new low for the outlet in its coverage of Jerusalem:

Mainstream media outlets like NPR, @CNN, and the @nytimes are fawning over American Doctor, a documentary on Gaza medical workers. What they won't tell readers: CAMERA has previously revealed that one of the film's featured doctors, Mark Perlmutter, is an anti-Israel

The @nytimes had many words to describe Yemen's Ansar Allah (Houthis), none of which conveyed the death and destruction the designated terror group has inflicted inside and outside of Yemen. camera.org/article/to-the…

JUST IN: In response to urging from CAMERA, the @nytimes has now updated the Spanish edition of its Sept. 14 article on the NAZA documentary. On Sept. 16, the Times removed the line reporting that Israelis "largely view themselves" as Oct. 7 victims from the English edition,

At CAMERA, we work to make sure your child gets an education, not an indoctrination. Weak civics education helps fuel rising antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiment among young Americans. If liberal democracy no longer seems valuable here, Israel’s identity as the only liberal

The BBC appears to be deciding the level of responsibility a child bears for their own actions based not on age, but on ethnicity. When we look at comparable reporting on allegations against Palestinian children, British children and Israeli children, a disturbing pattern

In hindsight, no one should be surprised the @nytimes tried to excuse reporting that Israelis only "view themselves" as Oct. 7 victims as an editing error. In 2025, after a Sydney crowd chanted "F*** the Jews," the Times claimed reports of antisemitic slurs were "unfounded"—and

The @nytimes initially reporting that Israelis only "view themselves" as Oct. 7 victims wasn't an isolated incident. Ezra Klein repeatedly omitting basic historical facts is just another example of the Times' documented bias. Watch the breakdown:

"This is sickening. It is utter absurdity." CAMERA's @jessisajew on the @nytimes initially reporting that Israelis merely "view themselves" as the victims of the Oct. 7 massacre:

Replying to another post

And at its worst, the bias degenerates into outright bigotry. In 2019, the Times published an antisemitic political cartoon depicting Benjamin Netanyahu as a guide dog wearing a Star of David leading a blind Donald Trump—an image straight out of Nazi-era propaganda.

Replying to another post

Or look at how they frame Hamas terror tactics. The Times repeatedly labels Hamas’s use of human shields in mosques as merely an "Israeli accusation"—despite the Times’s own past reporting already confirming it as fact. camera.org/article/the-pa…

Replying to another post

Facts are routinely rewritten to fit a narrative. For instance, when the outlet refused to correct an opinion column which erroneously identified Tel Aviv as Israel's capital and seat of government. camera.org/article/does-i…

Replying to another post

These aren't isolated mistakes. A Sept. 7 study in Studies in Conflict and Terrorism by Yale’s Edieal Pinker analyzed 1,559 NYT articles. The data confirmed a "dominant narrative assigning near-exclusive agency and responsibility to Israel while diminishing Hamas."

Replying to another post

CAMERA has long documented this pattern. After a crowd at the Sydney Opera House chanted "F*** the Jews," the Times claimed in 2025 that accusations of anti-Jewish slurs were "unfounded"—initially declining to amend the story even when confronted with direct video evidence.

Replying to another post

First, flagged by the Free Beacon's @irastoll: The @nytimes issued a correction on Sept. 15 admitting an "editing error" where a caption claimed U.S. bombs supplied to Israel were 40,000 pounds. The actual size? 2,000 pounds. An "error" that inflated the number twentyfold to

Replying to another post

Next, outreach from CAMERA's @TamarSternthal prompted a Sept. 16 Editors' Note after the Times reported that Israelis only "view themselves" as Oct. 7 victims. The Times admitted this "inadvertently suggested that Israelis’ experience as terror victims was a matter of

The @nytimes initially reported that Israelis merely "view themselves" as Oct. 7 victims, then blamed the outrageous line on an "editing error." An error doesn’t explain a pattern. A recent study by Yale's Edieal Pinker documented a clear pattern of anti-Israel bias in NYT

Replying to another post

"CAMERA today prompted a social media uproar and an Editor’s Note at The New York Times after the Gray Lady reported that 'Israelis still largely view themselves as the victims of Oct. 7,' wording which suggests that Israelis were not, in fact, the victims of Hamas’ horrific Oct.

Sometimes an Editors' Note just isn't enough. When the @nytimes wrote that Israelis "view themselves" as Oct. 7 victims, it wasn't an isolated mistake—it reflected a broader, documented pattern of minimizing Israeli suffering. Read @TamarSternthal's new analysis on CAMERA's